Reading the Claim

The market’s claims arrive already argued. This track is about the reading that comes before agreeing or disagreeing: what a study design can support, what an audit actually checks, and what the arithmetic on a bench really says.

Every module is open without an account. Sign in if you want the track to remember where you stopped.

1. 1The evidence ladderName the seven levels in order, and say why a review that discusses trials is not itself trial evidence.6 min→
2. 2Read an audit end to endFollow a claim from the sentence a seller wrote to the study it rests on.12 min→
3. 3Read a compound entryFind mechanism, monitoring and who-should-avoid without taking the summary on faith.10 min→
4. 4The bench mathTurn a vial, a diluent volume and a target into an honest barrel reading.10 min→
5. 5Capstone: post a sheet for critiqueAssemble a reference sheet from published figures and put it up where it can be argued with.20 min→

Nothing in this track tells anyone what to take, and finishing it certifies nothing. It is a reading course: the exercises are graded by the same functions the publication runs on, and the capstone is judged by whoever reads it in the forum. Track id reading-the-claim.